Skip to main content

Faraday Future FF91 first drive: Raw power

 

There’s a moment behind the wheel of the Faraday Future FF91 when it hits you: The sheer shock of 1,050 horsepower, the instant acceleration of an electric motor that can take you from a standstill to 60 mph in 2.3 seconds.

Recommended Videos

For me, it happened at around 50 mph on the streets of Las Vegas on Sunday, the day before CES 2020 officially kicked off. This is one of the best cars we’ve seen at the show this year.

More Cars at CES 2020

I was approaching a traffic signal on Sierra Vista Drive that had just turned yellow and mashed the pedal to jump through the light. The car blasted forward like a spaceship striving for orbit while my insides danced around, excitement wrestling with sheer terror and the Bavarian pretzels with Easy Cheese I wolfed down earlier in the day.

There’s a moment when you realize what g-forces feel like. There’s a moment where you realize that the power of an electric motor is nothing like a gas engine, which lacks torque at the top and bottom of each gear. Put simply, gas-powered cars lack oomph when you need it.

This car? Not at all. That means you can drive differently. You don’t wonder whether you have enough power to pass that slow driver ahead. It’s just a question of when. You don’t wonder if you’ll make the light. It’s just a question of how far down the road you’ll be when you let up on the pedal.

Faraday Future has burned through a billion dollars building the FF91, which CEO Carsten Breitfeld told me will go on sale to the public before the end of 2020. As the first journalist in the world to test drive the car — the sandstone-colored version, code-named G2-18 – it feels worth every penny.

What does zero to sixty in 2.3 seconds feel like? It feels like victory.

The vehicle design

The Faraday Future FF91 in Las Vegas
We drove the Faraday Future FF91 — though it’s still just a prototype. Image used with permission by copyright holder

To be fair, Faraday’s FF91 is not ready for prime time yet. The car I drove was a prototype. Breitfeld and Bob Kruse, SVP of product execution, drove it from company headquarters in Los Angeles to Las Vegas on Sunday, a 270-mile trip that would tax the range of any electric car, even without the extra strain from driving through the mountains between.

Breitfeld says they stopped at a Tesla Super Charger station along the way, though only to chuckle at the people marooned there. The Tesla Model 3 has a range of up to 325 miles, although the company sells long-range versions of the Model S that can handle 375 miles. Faraday claims a range closer to 400, though final numbers remain to be ironed out.

The pair of FF91s landed in Vegas with over a hundred miles of range left. I burned through a few of the remaining miles myself racing up and down the strip.

The passenger experience is heaven.

The engine might be ready, but details remain as unpolished as the touchscreens, which had a few smudges from the day’s wear and tear. The car has four doors that open outward at the press of a button or by speaking a command. They didn’t always work.

The car’s controls are essentially done, but they’re not fool-proof. When shifting from Park to Drive, for example, the stick didn’t lock into place with as satisfying of a click as I would have liked. And the turn signals were hard to turn on and off. These issues will be solved before the car goes on sale, I’m told.

There were bigger details. An exposed circuit board and wiring harness sat under the passenger side seat, and I was told to push a giant red button if I felt like I was losing control of the car. To be clear, I never felt out of control — but the need for the button shook me. Keep in mind, this is the prototype GS-18, not a final car. I didn’t need a reminder that crashing the multi-million dollar vehicle was a possibility.

The driver’s seat was comfortable, and the array of 11 screens that surround passengers in the car were wonderfully responsive. They were much like a smartphone or tablet screen. And the back seat? Ahhh, the back seat is a dream.

Chinese customers are far more likely to be driven around than American customers, the company told me. And if that’s you, you’re in for a treat. The passenger experience is heaven. The car is long, affording room for seats that recline all the way. The cabin is enormous. Turn on spa mode, and the seat goes back, the lights get all dreamy, and soothing music and visuals play on a 42-inch screen that hangs down from the ceiling. I don’t need my hotel room, I thought. I can sleep here.

The backstory

The Faraday Future FF91 in Las Vegas
The rear of the Faraday Future FF91. Image used with permission by copyright holder

Breitfeld is no stranger to electric cars. Before joining Faraday he was head of BMW i, a sub brand of BMW dedicated to electric cars. While there he oversaw the launch of the BMW i3 and the i8 plug-in hybrid sports cars — two radical designs from one of the auto industry’s biggest players.

Breitfeld also helped start Chinese electric-car startup Byton, and most recently served as CEO of another Chinese firm, Iconiq Motors. Kruse joined more recently, coming from Karma, one of the big competitors in the space.

For a thorough history of Faraday, read the excellent long-form feature by The Verge’s Sean O’Kane. Here’s the short version: A streaming media company called Letv made a splash at CES 2016 with its new cell phones, and the broad ambitions of the company and its founder, Jia Yueting, quickly emerged. The company would be LeEco, and it would make everything, even electric cars. At least, that was the plan.

The company continued pouring hundreds of millions into R&D, hiring the smartest engineers and designers in dogged pursuit of its dream.

While Yueting burned through billions, he secretly founded another company in California. That company was Faraday. Le Eco collapsed under the weight of its debt, and Faraday groaned along with it, but the company continued pouring hundreds of millions into R&D, hiring the smartest engineers and designers in dogged pursuit of its dream.

The technology

Much of the money poured into the FF91 went to technology, which explains some of what the car can do. Take the batteries, for example. They’re liquid cooled, solving part of the thermal challenge and aiding with range. The car not only has all-wheel drive, but also four-wheel steering, meaning the rear wheels pivot to give it a tight turning radius.

The interior looks ripped from a sci-fi movie. There’s an LCD panel where the instrument cluster should be, and three 4G LTE connections that power various infotainment options. There’s also facial recognition built in, to identify the car’s passengers and customize to their needs, including the radio stations they like to listen to, and temperature preference.

It’s been an easy joke that Faraday Future was a look at the faraway future, as the company struggled to build something it would never achieve. If the company can polish it up and finish it off, however, the FF91 will be justification for all the money it has spent. The future isn’t that faraway after all.

Follow our live blog for more CES news and announcements.

Jeremy Kaplan
As Editor in Chief, Jeremy Kaplan transformed Digital Trends from a niche publisher into one of the fastest growing…
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Audi halts vehicle deliveries to the U.S. as it mulls impact of tariffs
2021 Audi Q5

If you’d been thinking of buying an Audi, now might be the time.  The German brand, owned by the Volkswagen Group, has announced it would halt shipments to the U.S. in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all imported vehicles.
Audi is currently holding cars that arrived after the tariffs took effect, on April 3, in U.S. ports. But it still has around 37,000 vehicles in its U.S. inventory, which should be able to meet demand for about two months, according to Reuters.
Automakers on average hold enough cars to meet U.S. demand for about three months, according to Cox Automotive.
Audi should be particularly affected by the tariffs: The Q5, its best-selling model in the U.S., is produced in Mexico, while other models, such as the A3, A4, and A6 are produced in Germany.
Holding shipments is obviously a temporary measure to buy time for Audi and parent company Volkswagen. If tariffs stay in place, vehicle prices would likely have to go up accordingly, unless some production is shifted to the U.S. Volkswagen already has a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and is planning a new plant in South Carolina. That latter plant, however, isn’t expected to be operational until 2027 and is currently dedicated to building electric vehicles for VW’s Scout Motors brand.
Other global automakers have also taken drastic measures in response to Trump’s tariffs. Jaguar Land Rover on April 5 said it is pausing shipments of its its UK-made cars to the United States this month. The British sports-luxury vehicle maker noted that the U.S. market accounts for nearly a quarter of its global sales, led by the likes of Range Rover Sports, Defenders, and Jaguar F-PACE.
And on April 3, Nissan, the biggest Japanese vehicle exporter to the United States, announced it will stop taking new U.S. orders for two Mexican-built Infiniti SUVs, the QX50 and QX55.

Read more
Waymo faces questions about its use of onboard cameras for AI training, ads targeting
Two people exit a Waymo taxi.

In an iconic scene from the 2002 sci-fi film Minority Report, on-the-run Agent John Anderton, played by Tom Cruise, struggles to walk through a mall as he’s targeted by a multitude of personalized ads from the likes of Lexus, Guinness and American Express, everytime hidden detectors identify his eyes.
It was clearly meant as a warning about a not-so-desirable dystopian future.
Yet, 23 years later that future is at least partlially here in the online world and threatens to spread to other areas of daily life which are increasingly ‘connected’, such as the inside of cars. And the new testing grounds, according to online security researcher Jane Manchun Wong, might very well be automated-driving vehicles, such as Waymo’s robotaxis.
On X, Wong unveiled an unreleased version of Waymo’s privacy policy that suggests the California-based company is preparing to use data from its robotaxis, including interior cameras, to train generative AI models and to offer targetted ads.
“Waymo may share data to improve and analyze its functionality and to tailor products, services, ads, and offers to your interests,” the Waymo’s unreleased privacy statement reads. “You can opt out of sharing your information with third parties, unless it’s necessary to the functioning of the service.”
Asked for comments about the unreleased app update, Waymo told The Verge that it contained “placeholder text that doesn’t accurately reflect the feature’s purpose”.
Waymo’s AI-models “are not designed to use this data to identify individual people, and there are no plans to use this data for targeted ads,” spokesperson Julia Ilina said.
Waymo’s robotaxis, which are operating on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin, do contain onboard cameras that monitor riders. But Ilina says these are mainly used to train AI models for safety, finding lost items, check that in-car rules are followed, and to improve the service.
The new feature is still under development and offers riders an opportunity to opt out of data collection, Ilina says.
But as we all get used to ads targeting based on everything that’s somehow connected to the web, it seems a once-distant vision of the future may be just around the corner.

Read more